World Make Tower Of Ascension Mob Levels Correspond To Strength / Actual Recommended Level.

Lol who voted no, the mob levels when you look in toa vs other mobs you see at the level, the other mobs you see at their lvl are much stronger. For example an average mob in corkus vs Steampunk Sentry, usually the corkus mobs are stronger. Or that grind spot behind FF, the mobs it’s way stronger than the mobs in Toa Floor 7, in which ToA floor 7 is “Lvl 100-100”

What would the intervals of the floors be then, apparently at lvl 45 you should be done with like floor 4, I’m assuming the floors will be like lvl 40-42 then floor 2 would be like lvl 42-45 and so on

 

Huh, floor 4 at level 45?
I always thought that:
40-45 - > Floor 1
45-50 -> Floor 2
50-55 -> Floor 3
55-60 > Floor 4
60-65 -> Floor 5
65-70 -> Floor 6
75-75 > Floor 7

5 level intervals make perfect sense

 

Im pretty sure Alkevo is a DPS test to see if you can do Death (I got carried thro Alkevo but couldnt do him myself, and found death hard as well, but with my new relik i found death and Alkevo easy.

Anyway I was thinking my old logic that youd do floor 4 at lvl 45 and do a new floor every 10 lvls, but that wouldnt make much sense if thet made it like that, but yeah 5 lvl intervals do make sense

 

bump time!

 

bump, another day of players being surprised after being told ToA is designed to be completed at 75

 

the mob levels in ToA directly correlate to the actual scaling of the mobs' strength off the baseline, rather than the level they're meant to be fought. confusing? yes, absolutely, but changing the levels displayed isn't an option here (if you did, you'd have to do the same for a lot of other mobs across the world.)

 

Yes, but the actually levels don't need to be changed, just the signs telling players when they should be fought.

To say I disagree with changing the actual mobs level, we'll I do. CoW for example would be light years off, and same for most other bosses.
I think a simple change in signs would be enough to inform most players.

 

yeah, it could definitely be improved. i'll ask around, no guarantees it'll change though.

 

at least the signs please :((

 

if i recall correctly, mobs from the hive are stronger than what their displayed level would suggest so in situations like these i think it would be fine

 

The more I think about this, the more it doesn't make sense.

Using mob levels to show how much they are off baseline is a big ??? when done in the way they were done for ToA, in a way that completely contradicts with mob levels in general. The pre-gavel display level argument doesn't make sense either, because it's been a long time since gavel.

I'd get a few levels above the level they're meant to be fought at because of the being above baseline, but putting lv75 mobs at 100+?

 

Death is an absolute joke tf you talking about, I could do an easy solo as a lvl 70, yes I was a shaman but that time my mana sustain sucked *** so aura didn't work too well. Ig if you have a weapon that deals his ele weakness he's not that hard to solo, he has a massive wall of hp yes, but 10k/10s hpr isn't that much tbh. Floor 6 and 7 should be the same lvl tbh bc alkevo is a pure dps to see if you stand a chance against death.

 

Another reason for this change (not like there needs to be another reason but w/e): No more ToA mythic grinding "exploit"

 

I wouldn't mind if ToA was completely revamped. I actually almost finished the quest today in one go using an Archer with level 60ish gear (4k HP, Spectral Slingshot lvl 67). I just need a better weapon for Death.

Every floor on each level is only 2 things: absurdly easy (every melee mob) or annoying (every projectile mob). It's pretty much spamming arrow shield and arrow bomb the whole time, and the only difference between the two is that you circle strafe in the latter. And when you get to a boss, you spam both arrow shield and arrow storm. That's it.

Today ToA feels like an outdated version of the Hive. Everything ToA does the Hive does better in terms of floors (quality over quantity), rewards (incremental, choose your own, conflicts less with builds), and bosses (every ToA boss besides Death is a joke). Sometimes I had to wait around for mobs to spawn in some levels, especially in the first 2 floors, which I have no idea what that's about.

I would still be fine if the rewards didn't change, but the gameplay definitely should.

 

bumperino aaa

 

Confirmed questbook change and (hopefully) sign changes are good and all, but mob levels,,,, Fixing them also fixes toa grinding

 

I wouldn't mind if this is changed, but just when ToA is released, people aren't that skillful yet. Also there are a lot more gears and power creep thingy which makes this easy for level 70s nowadays

 

No, display levels were fine back then because the max level was 75 so no one was confused.

There has been gear powercreep, but that only supports my argument since it's very doable at 75 in the current state of the game.

 

let's add that i've been playing wynncraft for 3 years and i've never ever attempted a lv75 solo on ToA purely due to display levels