The Resistance

It's time, isn't it?

 

Yup. I got my pm

 

Hmm ok..
so if I this right.

I just go
Propose: {[Jim, Bob, Robby ]} for Mission [Day 1].

Correct?

 

The names must be names of people who are in the game. Aside from that, though, replace [Day 1] with 1A (as this is the first mission of the first day) and you're good.

 

Gots it!

I'm just gonna choose the first three people..
as no one wants to volunteer

Propose: {[@(Meric), @Gigavern ,@ubershaften ]} for Mission [Day 1A].

 

Mission 1A: {(Meric), Gigavern, ubershaften}

All players, please PM me whether you would like to approve or reject this mission. Your vote will be made public.

 

I have a suggestion. Let's deny the first few, so We can see If the mission leaders suggest each other, suggesting they may be spies, and If they are spies, they will have to not suggest each other for missions to stay undetected, so its a easy mission done?
In case you didnt understand: deny the first few, then see What We can deduce based on the proposals and What pepole suggested said proposals!

 

We could, but it's not foolproof. Especially since you just said that. Now they most definitely won't mutually propose eachother.

At least for this first round we're basically in the dark. We can blindly accept or blindly decline, most likely won't change much. We should outnumber the spies, so there's a good chance our first leader's one of us, at least.

 

Hm. But by saying that, they won't suggest Each other as it would be obious. Over a long time, they have to put each other in the missions to win, and it will be obious as "hey one of theese is always on a mission that fails and they suggest each other! They are spies!"

 

They don't have to suggest eachother. Spy 1 suggests Spy 2, who suggests Spy 3, and so on. It's a simple matter of flipping the order after that.

Feels redundant.

 

Besides, seeing who approves and who denies a mission helps a lot with the deduction process.

 

yea 1-2-3 is the best mission for beginning since we can guess at the leader statuses next, but we've hardly had discussion time

True, and this is more logic-based than mafia, so I'm "gonna have a hard time"
I didn't receive a ping for some reason...
So I'd say reject this, I have not enough posts to gutread and we need more discussion.

 

Reject? I already approved.
I'm mean, the bad guys wouldn't really sabatoge the first mission. And they're definetly smart enough not to show thier cards too early.

 

I approve.

 

Counterexample: every long game i've played
breadcrumb? it looks like you don't want someone on your team sabotaging the first mission if you are spy...

 

Hm. Well scumread. Should We avoid putting him on missions?

 

So me wanting us to win makes me a spy?

 

It isn't wanting to win; it's wanting to win, and acting scummy whilst doing so. This really reminds me of our first mafia game, so since you are acting on it slight scumread.
I actually didn't think that was an extremely likely breadcrumb, but your reaction tells me it was possible you intended to say so. Gut says {Nuggets, Josh_Legacy, ubershaften} but I'm not all sure...

 

Acting Scummy
*flashback to literally every mafia game I've been in*

 

I was acting scummy? I just asked you What We Should Do, because you're the expert.