1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
Dismiss Notice
Wynncraft, the Minecraft MMORPG. Play it now on your Minecraft client at (IP): play.wynncraft.com. No mods required! Click here for more info...

Guide Should You Id Morph Stardusts?

Discussion in 'Wynncraft' started by Shabcarb, Mar 2, 2021.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Shabcarb

    Shabcarb Well-Known Adventurer HERO

    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Minecraft:
    Since I get dozens of Morph Stardusts every day from only playing a couple hours each day, keeping my Morph Stardusts to sell on the Trade Market has become a problem. All of my Trade Market slots are full, and my stored Morph Stardusts now take multiple pages in my bank. I haven't come across another post like this one since their nerf, so I figured I'd do the math for myself and share it: Should I identify my Morph Stardusts? This math was performed in 1.20.1.

    If you don't want to read the math: No, you shouldn't. Just sell them to a blacksmith unidentified. Here's the math I used to come to this conclusion, and if I made any errors or overlooked anything please let me know.

    Base Emerald Values:
    Unidentified Sell Profit: 6 - 18
    ID Cost: 158
    Identified Sell Value: 73 - 219

    Identifying, then selling: (73-158=-85) - (219-158=61) ➔ -85 - 61 (Avg. -12)
    Average unidentified sell: 6+18=24 ; 24/2=12 ➔ 12
    Result: Identifying then selling produces a net loss of 24 emeralds on average.


    Trade Market:
    I've made a habit of selling any Morph Stardust I get on the Trade Market for 200e (before tax) per, regardless of its stats. Despite this low sale price, I only sell around 1 Morph Stardust per day with multiple listed at a time. Nobody has to sell at this amount, but it works as an example value.

    Assuming 1 Morph Stardust is sold each day, there would be a profit of 42 emeralds per day. Comparing that to the un-ID sell value's average, the relative profit (compared to selling at the blacksmith) is 30 emeralds. So, selling on the Trade Market would trade 1 real-time day for a 30-emerald profit. In my opinion, that isn't worth it. I'd rather save time at the relative cost of 30 emeralds.
     
  2. kioph

    kioph ahh yes heavy melee hmm yes

    Messages:
    1,723
    Likes Received:
    2,758
    Trophy Points:
    162
    Out of curiosity, is there a reason you decided to store that many in the first place? Nothing wrong with it, it just seems like an excessive amount of morph stardusts.
     
  3. Shabcarb

    Shabcarb Well-Known Adventurer HERO

    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Minecraft:
    Laziness. That, plus a mix of IDing-habit and experimentation.
     
    kioph likes this.
  4. Greedus

    Greedus Knight of Wynn VIP+

    Messages:
    370
    Likes Received:
    572
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Minecraft:
    Do you use morph? Since I do, I always ID them just in case I get a better one.
     
  5. Shabcarb

    Shabcarb Well-Known Adventurer HERO

    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Minecraft:
    Nah, I haven't put research into a specific loadout yet. I'm just using the best individual piece I've naturally come across.

    Out of the stardusts I've IDed though, I kept the one with the best stats in case I use it in the future.
     
    Greedus likes this.
  6. TotemOfUndying

    TotemOfUndying Well-Known Adventurer

    Messages:
    339
    Likes Received:
    226
    Trophy Points:
    70
    Minecraft:
    do you mean you shouldn't just sell a blacksmith AFTER they're identified?
     
  7. Shabcarb

    Shabcarb Well-Known Adventurer HERO

    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Minecraft:
    If you've already identified it, go ahead and sell it to a blacksmith. This thread is supposed to answer whether Morph Stardusts should be identified or not to begin with.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.