Item Researches And Possible Problem For Archer Mythics.

I wish
And I think this is the first buff archer thread I've seen

 

Mythics, the rarest joint you could ever smoke

 

when people say that infused hive bow damage is too high
think they mean that mythic bow damage is too low

 

Don't remind me ;-;

 

HE LIVES
Now back to your cage, we need Corkus out now

 

Now now, I'm sure he has the April Fool's joke planned out perfectly

 

Mhm okay, thanks for clearing things out. I already added a part regarding this into the main post.

But still, I believe there are still enough reasons to balance mythics. There has been some threads about discussing the mythic prices recently, such as this one. https://forums.wynncraft.com/threads/mythic-costs.179712/ I hope seeking the market price is one of the fastest ways to see how Mythic items are being utilized among players. (Or Class Builds.)
Maybe almost all the mythic weapons are already balanced out, people just do not notice how useful all of them are, or haven't figured out how to maximize the outcome for each mythic.
Now this is real opinions about them, but people keep saying to mythic boots, "Nope."
Despite of their rarity, they're too useless, making players who got them disappointed. They probably didn't match what players actually wanted, probably because they're too unique, such as Galleon is Earth/Water, which I don't think that many people use.
Maybe we're just overestimating the power of mythic gears, even though considering the maximum possible IDs that can be implemented to each armors, it is not possible to have better IDs than what they have right now.
But you know, Boreal is like, the worst. We can at least re-consider the way of Boreal IDs, and hopefully other items as well.

 

oh god another one
http://imgur.com/gallery/RpcZGE7

 

Stratiformis is outstandingly bad? lol your high

________________________________

Exactly, and someone said that strati's 91% ws is horrible

 

I've never said Strati is horrible. Only if not including special IDs, it is bad.
Even if I try to include that, it heavily depends on who use the special ID. So if the weapon was rated bad in the table, it doesn't mean they're totally bad only because of the damage. It still has their own special IDs to counter the damage disadvantage, as Salted said.
What I tried to say at the first time is, Archer mythic damage are outstandingly bad compared to other classes' ones. Their rarities are too concentrated into special IDs.
Also, you can easily notice Grandmother (and Ignis) is bad. Just look at other classes' same elemental mythics. Grimtrap? Higher damage than Grandmother, not even having big negative regen, but it has crazy amount of lifesteal!
I'm here to talk about balancing Damage-ID facts, not just bullying some specific mythics.

 

I would rather unique properties for weapons, in a sense that they dont rely on damage.

 

Yea, that's probably what we want. Archer mythics are actually good designed in terms of their personalities.
We now gotta move onto the debate of nerfing crazy damage mythics.

 

Hmm Cata?

 

Cata is balanced, It's hard to boost it's damage without ending up at 1 HP

 

Basically we need a new mythic thunder bow

 

I would actually prefer nerfing the current mythics as opposed to buffing the archer mythics. The archer mythics are how I feel mythics should be. Not massive ammounts more damage, but a quirk, that people would tell tales about for ages, and thus, mythics. I feel that solely just "High Damage" should just be reserved for mythics like cata/alka

 

lolxd

 

Lol why would you have to actually boost up dmg a lot? At base it already deals more than enough. If you go tanky with it you can still deal pretty high dmg and have quite a bit of health ._.

 

https://forums.wynncraft.com/threads/in-depth-guide-cataclysm-2x-lvl-100-required.175980/
Yeah, this build has been too successful...
The price has been already crazily high just as Strati, so nerfing Cata would cause some problems. They would't nerf Cata just to get flamed from all Cata users.. or would they