Archer/Hunter Help How Does Full Morph Archer Suck?

So, I'd say roughly 60-70% of people when I say I'm using a full morph infused hive archer say it sucks. Roughly 50-60% of those people either don't tell me how it sucks and just say it sucks, and the other 10-20% says "morph+aquarius" is better and that's it. Can someone please explain how because I don't understand how it apparently sucks so bad for a few reasons.

1. Typically when powdering it correctly you typically hit 10.3-10.5k bombs after putting in your skill points, which is fine imo for a rainbow build.

2. For everyone who says "Use Morph Aqua Infused" you're even more spell spammy then me tbfh. Morph set can easily hit the intel cap of 147, making 7/4s mana regeneration perfectly fine as long as you can alternate between spells. Using Aquarius instead of Morph-Steel is sacrificing about +70 total sp, you now have -thunder defense when leaving armour unpowdered using aquarius, and you're sacrificing ~500-1000 ish damage, for what? Just extra mana regeneration you literally don't need?

3. For everyone who says "Ah but wait m8 what about elemental defenses and all that jazz?" for mobs with high rainbow and only like 1-2 weakness, Morph can use one of every technical "end game" elemental weapon excluding mythics (Cluster powdered with thunder, Gales, if you decide to even though I don't you can use Cometflinger as well, TT, and Hellstrand) and usually fighting mobs with tons of rainbow defense, such as final form Idol, I use Hellstrand.

Btw in case you're wondering, if you were to put enough strength in order to use Cometflinger, all the other weapons I mentioned do roughly 9k bombs when powdered (except for hellstrand which I believe did more around 8-8.5k with fire powders but also did around 9k with thunder) but that's not including when you use them against mobs with weakness to them. It might be harder to spell spam without 7/4s and only 5/4s, but if you spell spam well enough you still shouldn't run out of mana to use on most occasions.

4. Talking about defenses now, full morph gives exactly 12k hp and 110 defenses of each element. While it's obviously not a ton of elemental defense, it's still decent.

5. The max you can have on full morph is 61 sp of every element at the cost of using only 20 of your sp (costs 2 sp of everything for topaz which gives +1, then you need to put an additional 2 sp for morph-gold, and then if you have high enough of the sp on the morph-gold you shouldn't need to put any more points in. I do because my best one has +1 strength) Of course, everyone doesn't have perfect sp morph set, so I'd say it's more around 50 sp of every sp with a decent-good ish morph-set, which is still pretty fine imo. This combined with pretty decent-good bombs is pretty nice.

Those are most of the bigger reasons why I don't understand how full morph sucks. Of course, I have seen builds that do more damage than full morph-infused for rainbow (I believe I saw one yesterday that did around 11k-11.5k bombs), but what I think makes morph make up for that lost damage is the fact that can hit the intel cap and has much better overall sp (obviously). If someone could please explain how it sucks I would be grateful, because I genuinely don't see why people make it seem extremely bad and useless.

 

What.
Full morph is good if you aren't addicted to high mana regen

 

7 morph aqua pft
7 morph capri real shit

normal rainbow also works about the same but is a bit more interesting as it doesnt just use 8 of the same item

 

7 morph capri I can understand because less sp and some defenses in exchange for more health than full morph and the same or very slightly better damage with 9/4s mr