1.20 Poll

Just because ERN is now playing a defensive position does not make them the defender. They are still the intruder. IBT keeps the pity cost even though they are wiped. It has to be something of a significant time for that dynamic to shift. The goal of the mechanic is to support the guild that held the territories. The defender doesn't lose its protection just because it was wiped, it is still protected and hence if it does reclaim from zero still has pity which helps them. It has to be rather significant.

Playing a defensive stance doesn't suddenly make you the defender as to reap the benefits a defender has.

 

16k pity cost in the end for all those terrs doesnt seem so bad. Maybe the pity cost should be saved for the attacker? That means that for each attacker the cost would be different based on the amount of wars making it fair for everyone?


Also eden started a bunch of timers at the same time on ern, but even after those the costs were the same, it seems really weird that it didnt work. ERN had like 20+ terrs at some point and they lost so many terrs on the span of a few hours bc of all the reclaiming it should have at least made a small bit of pity work.

 

That would actually be much better. Currently it raises the costs for everyone. I could be facing pity just because a random guild poked at that guild earlier.

 

YE i meant it does nothing for the first attacking guild since uo to there you already had an stablished bank but ye for others it sucks that is why i said make it different for each attacker guild.

 

I am moving to guild politics channel

 

"Lol 1.19 guilds were attacker sided and that was wrong and i complained about it."

Sorry, I believed you meant that you believed it was attacker sided, then realized that that was wrong, and complained about that.

Hope you understand how I could misread it haha mbmb