Guilds Adding And Removing Certain Trade Routes

A discussion was started on the guild leader discord thing and I wanted to expand upon this.

Green represents adding trade route, red represents removing existing trade route.

The following are from @_Eth3real:





This one should make jungle easier to hold as it's a pain to have to deal with chokepoints literally everywhere:



Modified from @Peter#0001. That one SE change wouldn't do much but it really didn't make sense for that trade route to not exist. SE trade routes are a whole another story to which even I as PROF leader do not know how it really should be changed while fitting itself partly to the actual in-game map.



Rest are from me. Weird red connection should be removed:



Same as previous:



Why was a connection skipped here? No clue man. Maybe an error?



Ok this one is weird. I feel like Selchar should get more connections partly due to its proximity in the ocean and also due to its major trade route in-game, but giving it too many connections is obviously bad for balancing. Magenta represents potential routes to add/delete, and that I am not sure if these magenta additions should be implemented. Even the green route I am not really sure either because of balancing, but in-game it makes sense.






Going into which territories produce which resources is a whole another topic which I may go into in a different thread, but I will not do that here.

 

Everything seems cool
Nemract seems too far away from Selchar, and plus, you could just say Selchar just ships stuff to Durum which then ships stuff to Nemract.