Multiple Wars At A Time

With the recent rule changes, sub guilds are now completely allowed, as seen in this clip:



With this, you're now able to make multiple guilds and attack multiple territories at a time (and it's actually allowed now, even if it wasn't enforced before). Since it's officially allowed now, I feel like it'd make a lot more sense to just give guilds the ability to attack multiple territories at a time. This will prevent additionally useless guilds from being created, encourage people to keep recruiting to their main guild (since it will be a higher level majority of the time), and will help maintain the identity of existing guilds.

That's it, vote in pool if you agree. Thanks.

 

Why the heck not. I can imagine war servers being overloaded though. Should be a cap at 2 or 3 wars per guild

 

definitely yes

 

I don't see why it's unreasonable to have multiple wars on one server. Maybe if you start a war and your guild is already in war, you just get teleported to the same world and the mobs go in a different place. This would obviously cause problems if the territories were directly adjacent to each other though.

 

I foresee amusingly laggy war servers.

 

This would require 2 different world border boxes.. I don't think thats possible

 

Tbh I don't agree with sub guilds even tho I have used them in the past but I guess this at least makes it clearer who you are actually fighting against instead of trying to work out which sub guild belongs to which guild. Might as well remove the player cap on guilds as well while your there.

 

That’s only if they choose to do multiple wars in one world. If they went with this route, there are many ways to keep a player inside the territory other then world borders.

 

I agree, but there needs to be some cost associated with attacking more than one territory at once. By only being able to attack one place at once, speed is the most important factor so having lots of players in one war is the best strategy. If guilds could start an essentially unlimited number of wars at once, every guild member who can solo a war would be a captain and wars would only be about having the most captains.

To make your system work, there would need to be a cost to starting wars which increases based on the number of active wars. The first war could be free, but every subsequent war would need to cost progressively more, soft capping at something like three or four wars. Something like this would probably help small guilds keep a small amount of territory and allow large guilds to take over large amounts of territory.

That doesn't really fix the one man war problem, but if the holders of the territory could enter the war and fight with the attacker(s) it would probably solve the issue while making warring more interesting so I could get behind a change like that.

Look, I'm not against your suggestion (I supported it), but in its current form it's just not a well thought out (or not a well articulated) idea. Even setting aside the potential technical issues which I don't know enough about to comment on, to implement a system where you can have more than one war at once would require a complete overhaul of how warring works (something which I fully support).

 

Why pay a cost to attack more when you could just make a subguild and do it for free?

 

I could say the exact same thing about your entire suggestion though. Why change something when it makes no difference since you can just use subguilds?

Also, even with your suggestion, subguilds will still exist to get around the cap on people who can declare wars in any one guild. If your problem is with subguilds existing your solution is a really bad one as it does the exact opposite by giving subguilds a major buff.

In the current system, if you want to attack 100 territories at once you would need 100 guilds. People don't do that because it's really hard to grow and manage that many guilds. With what you're suggesting, decent guilds could use just one or two subguilds to take over entire areas at once.

 

Bumping this owo

 

It's bump o' clock, and this thread is looking extra barren...

 

It's bump o' clock.

 

It's bump time. Enjoy the thread spam.

 

Bumping these

 

idk fam, this suggestion might sound good on paper, but it just buffs subs and lags Wynn as a whole (It's laggy enough), thank you for (not) reading my suggestion, I'm gonna go back to hunting Royal Cake Slices