Quest My Thoughts On The 1.17 Quests

Oh. That makes a lot more sense.

 

If I'm correct, our actions in the past we're essentially "done" by someone else in that actual era, it just so happens that our actions just happen to mimic what actually happened? Save for some text and Rickeo's flame(?)

 

I know the lore is old, thats the reason why Im using it to support my point of view about the old Theorick being corrupted and knowing the fact that the undead are anger at him
The new lore update will makes me unable to support the background of the old Theorick, making the entire storyline about old Theorick are unclear, if I didnt continue with the old lore
The reason I have to clear out the old lore, is to let those who dont really know about the old Theorick can be able to compare between the old setting and the new setting
So they can do a easier comparing and think about whether they prefer the old quest or the new quest

________________________________

This explanation might able to answer why they can act natural to you in the other way
But this, is still not strong enough to explain why you, as the 'spectator' of the past, can obtain item from the past
While the Temple of Time has said you cant change the past...
And even I consider 'witness' as experience the past.. it still doesnt make sense for us being able to obtain items from the past

 

Not that I can tell. Psern even mentions just how advanced your equipment seems compared to theirs, and Theorick mentions the same. No one, aside from another Twain, at that time, could have had that sort of power to command.

 

I think I've misinterpreted a couple things. I was assuming that our actions actually did occur, though from someone else who happened to accompany Theorick in that era. In my previous post, when I said the main differences being "save for some text" I was referring to the mentions of our advanced equipment. Your explanation makes more sense than mine. Either way I still can't figure out where Rickeo's flame fits in chronologically speaking.