Dismiss Notice
Wynncraft, the Minecraft MMORPG. Play it now on your Minecraft client at (IP): play.wynncraft.com. No mods required! Click here for more info...
Dismiss Notice
Have some great ideas for Wynncraft? Join the official CT (content team) and help us make quests, builds, cinematics and much more!

World Add More Worlds

Discussion in 'General Suggestions' started by Northie_, Dec 20, 2017.

?

Agree?

  1. Yes

    50.0%
  2. No (Why)

    50.0%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Northie_

    Northie_ ʷʸ'ᵇᵉᵉ'ˡ ᶜʳᵉᵃᵗᵒʳ ❤︎ | she/they HERO

    Messages:
    319
    Likes Received:
    349
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Guild:
    Minecraft:
    After the 1.17 update, there have been a lot less worlds available because the max amount of players on each world went up. But most of the time, people don't want to join a world with 50-60+ people because they get lag easily.

    Add more depending on how many players are on the server.
    Right now there are approximately 830 people online, and only 10 worlds. That means that there'd be 83 people per world, which wouldn't work because the max is 75. If there were more worlds, this wouldn't be a problem.

    This ain't pretty: https://imgur.com/a/Q80CM
    (One server is red from lag)
     
    Last edited: Dec 20, 2017
  2. captainganon

    captainganon God of k | Derpalope VIP+

    Messages:
    11,319
    Likes Received:
    33,289
    Trophy Points:
    227
    Minecraft:
    Better solution is to reduce the amount of people allowed in each server, to at least 65. After that, maybe add more servers to accommodate player numbers, but otherwise more servers costs more money.
     
  3. WynnChairman

    WynnChairman Chairman of Wynn HERO

    Messages:
    3,451
    Likes Received:
    2,674
    Trophy Points:
    134
    Guild:
    Minecraft:
    yea i dont think increasing the server capacity was a good move cuz now they lag all the time and its annoying xd
     
    coolname2034 and Theeef like this.
  4. rainbowcraft2

    rainbowcraft2 Well-Known Adventurer VIP

    Messages:
    228
    Likes Received:
    144
    Trophy Points:
    67
    Minecraft:
    Let's see what we (or at least I) know:

    There was a recent efficiency update that made worlds slightly faster...
    Some players have slow computers and can play better on worlds with fewer players...
    Some players would prefer to play with a lot of other players...
    More players per world means more players get more from each bomb...
    The server as a whole is cheaper to run with fewer servers...
    There are many others as well...

    Here's what I think:
    To save money, they shouldn't have more servers. With a bit more speed, max 65 can most likely be afforded by each server without any decrease in speed...
    I think there should be maybe 5 servers with max 65 (or maybe 60) while the rest keep their 75 max. Each of the 5 servers will handle the lower player count better.

    Pros:
    Many players will have a faster experience.
    Wynn saves some money by not having more servers.

    Cons:
    The 60/65 player servers will likely get full and many players will be stuck with the current 75 max player servers.
    Those servers will be a bit less likely to get bombs, or at least not as many people will get the effects of them.
     
    coolname2034 likes this.
  5. Theeef

    Theeef Owner of The Crossroads CHAMPION

    Messages:
    2,297
    Likes Received:
    2,045
    Trophy Points:
    173
    Minecraft:
    OnlyOneServer dream
     
    Dr Zed, Enduh, ?! and 2 others like this.
  6. HalfCat_

    HalfCat_ Supporter of Catania GM Builder

    Messages:
    252
    Likes Received:
    815
    Trophy Points:
    76
    Creator Karma:
    Minecraft:
    I think this would be kind of cool but the literal price would not be worth it.
     
  7. redx475

    redx475 SysAdmin HERO

    Messages:
    213
    Likes Received:
    2,036
    Trophy Points:
    73
    Minecraft:
    Servers are automatically created based on the current player count. You tend to only see all servers full when there's a large influx of players and new servers can't start fast enough.

    That said, we are playing around with lowering the number of servers overall such that there won't be any new ones created unless most servers are full-ish. Apparently we went a little too far last week so I changed it again yesterday. You should see a bit more room as a result.
     
  8. Hexorcism

    Hexorcism warrior class enjoyer CHAMPION

    Messages:
    966
    Likes Received:
    1,461
    Trophy Points:
    146
    Minecraft:
    What would have to happen for there to be more room on each server?
     
  9. redx475

    redx475 SysAdmin HERO

    Messages:
    213
    Likes Received:
    2,036
    Trophy Points:
    73
    Minecraft:
    What do you mean, more players per server? That's limited by the fact that more players on each server = more lag.
     
    Hexorcism and Pyromanic like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.