Website & Forums Rewarding!

We have featured wynncraftian

no need to point out people who called ur bad suggestions well... bad
They're criticism your suggestions, okie? you made the suggestions, you receive the criticism, weather it's good or bad.

people alrdy have special titles

it will take forever to code in all these titles
we don't need a title for every1 that "deserves" it
thats what Featured Wynncraftian and Moderator ranks are for

read above plox ty



No.
Peace

 

Tbh I'd love to have a pink name, I've been asking for one since 2015 but now it seems kinda useless

 

I don't have much different feedback than what others have said, but I think it's extremely rude and uncalled for that you're pretty much mocking the people who criticized your suggestions. Remember, they criticized your suggestions, not mocked them, so why are you mocking them back? I suggest you delete this thread, or at least edit out the part that called out those people. Please don't do that again.

 

If this happens, people labeled "mean" will never be able to change. This puts everyone in a static place where they can't change

________________________________

And yea don't be so rude

 

Im not trying to be rude, people who critisize generally HELP the server, by clearing out all the bad ideas.

FW like I already said is for people who deserve it that much. This is for people who do big things in their own way.

^^^

________________________________

I notice most people (18) voted Definately Not.
I wonder, WHY, some 10 people dont show why they think this idea is shit.
I think its quite mean... To be honest.
It isnt a lot of work,
It is something for all the great people,
And nobody can get a Quote and Quote "Bad Tag"
Cause they get tags for doing good...​

 

I agree that there should be another way to get recognition (because some people will never get FW) but I don't think cosmetic tags is the way to do this.

 

Simple words : I agree but I cant think of another way which is completely useless but means something in a bit way.

 

but it IS a lot of work.
They would have to make a tag for everyone and they would have to stalk them so they can find out what they have done.

I mean it isn't just given, the player has to be nominated.
Moderator is also given to players who deserve it, but unlike fw more than 1 person can have it.
What's the point of making the Website team do all this work so some people can get a tag?
If they think they deserve recognition, they will be given one of these 2 ranks, depending on what they've done.

 

Kek
And you're saying criticism is bad, yet when it's YOUR suggestion, it's mean. If you're wondering why, read the comments.
People aren't obligated to say why they voted, maybe their reason has been stated. You can't expect the world to revolve around you.
And finally, even if something is simple, doesn't mean it isn't a bad idea.

 

*sigh*
I SAID CRITICISM IS GREAT
But it is a bad idea

 

I'm sensing contradiction here.
Make up your mind.
Something can't be good and a bad idea.

 

this is a horrible idea but I wanted to see who liked it

 

You're saying your idea is horrible? And unless you changed the poll settings when making this thread, you can't view votes

 

yes my idea is bad

 

This is BEGGING for a flame war at this point.

 

As much as I would LOVE a "Theorist" title (which let's be honest, if this got added, I would probably deserve), I don't agree with the idea. I picture so many people doing stupid small things that should count for nothing just got a title and then begging or raging if they don't get one.

 

The problem with this is there is no "System" to find who is a nice player, a helpful player, or even a mean player.
This would literally have to be one of the most sophisticated systems... So in short the only way to give people tags properly (You cannot judge someone off one post), you would have to have a moderator to look through all of a certain players posts.

(I say moderator because lots of players will troll and vote for the 'noob/jerk' title for everyone.