Pets & Horses Horse Armour

Hey the fellow citizens of Wynn and Gavel!!

I have a slight problem that I feel would benefit the whole community!

LOOT RUNS!

Now listen before you judge, I as much as the next person loves their loots runs! But your bag fills up too quickly and your sat there scrambling in your bags to switch out certain items.

I propose that horse armour is put into the game as a secondary portable inventory, this would help so many people who take potions on their journey or want to loot run and get more profit!

Think about it !!

Vezari

 

how would you get it?
what would happen if it gets lost?

 

I was thinking, purchasing it from the horse tamer guy where you do Stable Story, if it would be equipped to your horse so if you lose your horse, naturally you'd lose your armour.

 

As @Yuno F Gasai said (or atleast trying to say) add more detail to your suggestion. Such as how money slots, how much will it cost, ect.

Also from what I know, they are thinking about backpacks in the future but I have no clue how you got the horse armor, unless you mean chests then that only requires a mule/donkey to do that action.

 

packbacks

 

I hate my life

 

Yeah well if you did not notice if you have your horse spawn and then try to move an item in your inventory(bag) then the horse gets despawned

 

No. Not only does this not logically make sense, but it's mediocre for gameplay too.

Sure, we need more inventory. But the way to solve that is to simply expand the current bank, not make it accessible all across the entire map. A portable bank is stupidly overpowered and abusable.

Apart from that, the thread lacks details, as well as a good reason to even add it.

Lastly,

this isn't possible with the current system, both in Wynncraft and in Minecraft, though the latter could be fixed with plugins.

Overall, this thread lacks detail and reasoning, and has major flaws. 2/10.

 

as yuno said...

i feel im using way too much memes but bleh who cares

 

https://forums.wynncraft.com/threads/horse-armor.179643/

 

Thanks, even thougthis suggestion is different than mine