[gameplay] Quest Consiquences (15 Support) (title Change)

As most of you know, there ate quest with choice, yet they don't really feel like they dire consequences at all. The endings/choices are usually the same outcome but with a different story.

The problem:
-It makes wynncraft feel less realistic, since no matter what you do, your always going to end up with most the same story, but only in a different ending/outcome.

Suggestion:
Add quest (the staff approve this fourm, go ahead and start making those quest) that actually have consequences in the quest or in the future.

Ex.1 (in quest)
Make some quest with a consequence have a different effect by how long it took you to finish the quest. For example, in the mercenary, if we take too long, then almuj will be taken over, leading to a new quest or a different objective. The timer only activates if your online, so if you go offline during a quest, the quest you started won't change its time/efeffect, you can do the quest like normal. The timed quest only activates when you started it. It doesn't make sense if someone just arrived 2 months later and the guy who has this super evil plot just started.

Ex. 2 (after quest)
There are quest with decisions like iron heart pt.2. There should be a consequence by the decisions we make in a quest. For example, if we choose to keep the production of the golems in iron heart, then it would lead to a new quest being unlocked. Chose the other option, then a different quest will be unlocked. The decisions lead to different quest. It doesn't make sense that such a dire consequence would have little effect

Ex.3 (in quest)
In a quest like canyon guides, you have to escort a person to a place. And lime the timed quest example, there should be a consequence. However, in this example, this is if the person your escorting dies. If the person your escorting dies, then the quest would change objectives witha different reward or unlock a new quest in the future. It doesn't make sense if the person respawns


Things I will not add (unless a proper reasoning)
-failed quest: This means we wont get a reward at all, therefore grinding. That's why I put "change of the objective and outcome"
-effects/time taken before quest: It wont really be fair of a guy is being flooded with quest

Pros:
-Lets players stay longer
-Better experience in the game
-might let players reflect in the real world

Cons:
-Redstone
-Time consuming for mods
-Addiction


And make drukish not drunk anymore ffs, his been drunk for like 3 years


Note:
Saddly, I can't read anything within the first few hours of this post since im doing this around night time. And im sorry if you can't understand me, im using a phone to type and im kinda in a rush. If you can understand it, great! I don't have to re make this thread.

-Owenmae

________________________________

Im gonna add a pre-quest consequence later

 

*looks at the poll*
Can you leave a reason why....so it can improve

 

So what do you suggest? A timer running for every single quest for every single player?
Also some people can only come play once a week or two weeks, this won't be fair to them.

This will lead to a quest that is playable by only half of the players.

It also doesn't make sense we respawn

 

Another idea

Make quests that can be failed

 

"Retarded fat faggot" looks like someone either had trouble with the quest, or just thinks those words are fine. Believe it or not, there are people with actual mental retardation out there... Getting lost and maybe having bad eyesight so they can't follow you unless you're close doesn't make them retarded. What suggested he was a "faggot" ??? Do you even know what it means? Im pretty sure all villagers are pretty slim too.

I actually REALLY like this idea, it was gonna be part of my huge suggestion with upwards of 50 possible changes. But those 3 words man...

 

Oh hey look another person that doesn't get the joke.....

________________________________

Okay im willing to remove that

________________________________

Okay I dont get how you do that reply magic.

Ex.1:
You can still start a quest that you can already finish, im going to add more details later

Ex.2
The purpose of that is so people can stay longer, have a better experience

Ex.3
Beyond the grave almost enplanes it all

________________________________

Done

That isn't really going to help wynns economy, that's why I added changing objectives. And if we fail, we can't level, meaning there's going to be more grinding

 

Well they added the quest beyond the grave which explains the player respawning, it's probably the same for npcs

 

this is cool sure

 

Highlight the text a a quote/reply option should pop up.

But can't you finish all quests you can start?

Understood

So it makes sense that the villager respawns.

 

1.
Don't spam with quest then

3.
Beyond the grave explanes that you have to kill the monster that killed you to come back to life

 

That's the canyon guides; From the mountains is the level 67 quest with the hermit that has dentures

 

I don't understand.

Ever seen a villager punch something? They are really strong buggers

 

"Don't spam with quest"
Don't start too many quest or try to solve 20 all at once

"Ever seen a villager punch something"
Those are only steroid and meth villagers, were talking about villagers like yahya

 

I like the idea of having actual choices in quests, but I don't like the concept of failed quests.

 

Moderators do not create quest. That is what GMs do. The idea sounds cool, but your use of poor grammar, and improper punctuation are an instant turn off. Also this would be really time consuming, but if it could be accomplished I would definitely enjoy it. Would give more motivation to make different characters and whatnot.

 

"Consiquences"

 

I blame my phone because of damn autocorrect

Fixing that to

________________________________

The other errors are from me