Guilds Limiting Guild Territory

So there are thousands of guild out there(My guild is ranked #1k7 so yea) and only about 20 of them have territories and the top 3 guilds of wynn have at least 85% of the territories which is completely unfair to the smaller and weaker guilds. So I am thinking that every guild should only be able to claim the amount of land as their lv. For example HAX could only claim 67 and Libertas 60. Okay, I know I sound greedy and all but like it doesnt make sense for one guild to own over half the territory in the game :/

If you disagree, don't just support the other side, prove mine wrong instead, a lot more effiecient

 

ill let you in on a little secret, all the gavel territories are glitched and the other major guilds are too.

 

Or you know you could try and work for those territorys like the "Big guilds".

 

HAX own lots of territories --->
More guild exp --->
More members --->
Dominate with players

The highest level guild with no territory is NetherAscent which is lv 52 and the only reason why it is that high is because it took them 2 years to get there and I am pretty sure if I wait 2 years to get there HAX would be like lv 100 by then :/

 

all the gavel territories are glitched so we cant take them.
Imp and other level ~50 guilds are glitched since a year ago so we cant do anything.
even if we could Hax has the active player base the size of the legio active player base, they are invincible.
out only hope is that Hax will get glitched.

that's because TNA got so glitched they decided to abandoned ship and make TNI.

 

tbh all the other major guilds getting glitched just as you started powergrinding also helped

 

In case you didn't notice, you have 10 more players than #2 guild so pretty sure that contributes a lot to why you guys are #1. Kinda makes the "giant" guild seems small eh? And also, since you guys are hogging all the land, you will level up quicker and get more members basically guaranteeing you first place.

 

The tni tna transfer happened a couple of months ago. But not all guilds can do that as the majority of the players and leaders are glitched. You are right about the warring spirit, we've been warring for the last two years but with all the glitches we couldn't do it anymore.

________________________________

You get hate because you broke the soft cap on guilds (63) and turned the guild community toxic (not totally your fault but hax plays a big part in that)

 

Okay okay so you are saying that if we make a bunch of guilds and service to one we will beat you? Only way we gonna beat you is if everyone decide to follow Libertas and that'll be cutting it close. And as for your arguement for your members being fat, what makes you think you are the only one?

Also, if we do limit territories, you will still be number one so I don't even know why you think I am trying to make you number 2

 

Imperial and the rest haven't been able to kick inactive players or promote new ones as we don't have a leader in game.

I won't sugarcoat it, you made people jealous and mad as you didn't suffer from the crippling glitches at the start.

But as to our enthusiasm, war guilds are a rare sight now. Most guilds are reverting to the pre guild update guilds and becoming heavily community based. Looking at guilds as a whole I'd say it's a failed features that either needs a fix, rework or removal.

 

You said that we would still be the "number one guild" so why would we make a limited amout of territories? It looks like people who are in guild alone and can't take anything make these threads,as matspace said above,get more people and try to fight,people give up after hour of doing wars,and Im sure that if they added "limited territories" you would like to get it removed after some time having the max. amout of territories.

 

Remove territories = good
Make guilds do something else = even better

 

guilds dont give players any advantage whatsoever they're just there as a 'minigame' to wynn. stop stressing out over this and get on with your life

 

People like me would like to hop on once in a while without sacrificing my whole senior year on waiting for the three minute countdown just to solo a territory.
You can say I'm just saying this because I want to be on top of the leaderboard, but I was on the top and I said the same thing as you, but the situation is different. I was on top as part of an alliance that powerhoused the map, you are a single guild that holds 100+ for the last six months and counting. You broke the initial soft cap of guilds and ascended over the glitchy level 52. others cant become like you, you cant grind your guild in the 40's you need territory which cant be taken. The only chance to beat you is if a guild decides to out grind your bank which is a dull and boring victory

________________________________

By leader glitch I mean what happened to @Kvmilla , we called it guild limbo and it happened to a lot of people too but she is the most severe case I know, the game says she leads imperial but if she will log in it wont let her do anything with the guild, Imperial in game has been frozen since a year ago with no option for change.

 

I think there is a problem, but implementing a territory cap will only slightly lessen the problem. One might think that lessening the total number of territories would lower the relative power of the strongest guilds, but it would also lower the relative power of every guild. Instead of three guilds having claim to the entire map, it would become the top twelve guilds (I am using twelve because I can).
These twelve would have a much smaller territory to have to maintain, and would have a much higher emerald / territory ratio. That means that these top twelve guilds' territories would be even harder to capture, and result in an even more stagnant guildmap (even if there is more diversity). The positive feedback loop that guilds already are would become even worse, and guilds would eventually have enough players to patrol their territory realistically.
To be honest, guilds are much better as a "permanent party" system than anything else. Making them do something else where a group of buddies can stay together without pressure to leave to succeed in the better, less close group would be a great idea.

 

Then they should change it and you should be able to create guild at like lvl 80.

 

Meant that the guild is level 40

 

Wait, what do you mean by "assisted us in leveling"?
Btw fuq reported the glitches 9 months ago and we all contacted support a year ago and were told its being worked on.

The majority of Imperial is in limbo we can't leave or do anything.