Game Design Archer

There will always be a class that is the weakest and tbh its not archer that is the problem its warior glitch abuses and mage op heal you shouldnt be qblw to solo li with ease like they can atcher is ok

 

What is the weakest class then? I agree with the fact that there will always be a weakest class but archer is the weakest by far. It's not tanky at all and it's hard to deal damage. I don't understand what you're trying to say in the last bit

 

I say that archer is balanced he seems weak cuz warior is a fucking monster and mage is a god healing slave face tanking bosses shouldnt be a thing

 

Are people seriously saying archer shouldn't be buffed, what. It has shit defence, the range doesn't matter whatsoever when fighting most bosses and archer is supposed to have "the best weapons" but its weapons aren't nearly good enough.

________________________________

The fact that every other class is broken still makes it the weakest, even if it were a balanced class.

 

But archer isn't balanced, it gets less damage than all the other classes with shit defense. And don't say: But archer has range! 3/4 archer spells require you to be close to actually use it.

So do you still think archer is good?

 

I dont say archer is good I just want all of the classes to be "bad" as him

 

So you want all classes to be shit? Classes shouldn't only be balanced in with the other classes in mind, they also have to be balanced with the mobs and bosses in mind. If you want all classes to be as shit as archer, the game would become really hard. And we don't want that.

 

I want the game to be harder maybe buff it a bit to assasin level and nerf mage and warior

 

That's not just how it works, you can't just hit a buff class button. You need to choose what should be buffed. Warrior isn't even that op, it's just that the warscream bug needs to be fixed. A small mage nerf would be nice, make heal heal less health and cost more mana.

 

I know that warior is good cuz if glitchs but I dont like the idea of buffing his defense since archer made to be glass canon maybe make arrow bomb 300%

 

I'm fine with archer being a glass cannon. What I'm not fine with is archer taking DOUBLE the amount of damage of warrior. The base armor stats are completely broken, except for assassin because it's only 100%. Base armor stats should be the same across all classes, and instead some of each class' abilities/spells should have drawbacks. I open to other ways too, but the current system is broken.

 

That is something I agree with

 

Buff az and i am going to be ok!

 

No, no that is absolutely not true.

 

In my opinion, I think archer is okay as it is.

 

Ehhh, I feel like there should be SOME variation in defense, but something along the lines of giving archer 80, mage 85, assassin 100 and warrior 110

 

That's more balanced, but I still think the devs should also explore what I mentioned b4.

 

What is the weakest class in your opinion then? Assassin? Assassin is a class that requires skill to properly use, and therefor might seem the worst. The problem with assassin was mobility and that's fixed now.

 

meh, I don't have any problems with archer.

 

i have to disagree there

________________________________

you know thats the point of archers
squishy snipers

________________________________

that is because
that is the point of the class?
the skills of the class clearly says it deals a good amount of dmg (which i approve because i deal a lot of dmg in molten heights with a maelstrom (YES, im using a maelstrom at lvl 90 still kek) and the range actually matters because for example, no matter what you say, warrior and assassin cant deal that much damage by just getting on a high place, archer actually can, and the speed, the thing of this class is to either be a sanic arrow machine gun (air, thunder or water) or be a heavy sniper (fire or earth)