Guilds Two New Guild Commands (2 Supporters)

Alright just want to get this out of the way now. Before anyone says "we dont need new commands, we need the entire system fixed" this is actually related to that. Considering the fact that guilds STILL aren't fixed, what they're dealing with must be very difficult. What I am suggesting is the addition of the command /guild mute and /guild lock. Here's what the commands do.

/guild mute (player name)
- Makes it so that the player name inserted cannot speak in guild chat. Currently if a player changes their name while in a guild, they glitch and cannot leave or be kicked. As a result, punishments cannot properly be given or threatened, so any angry players can just spam and spam and spam and not be kicked. Thus /guild mute. Not sure if this would be possible considering glitched players are already ignored, or unable to use several functions.

/guild lock
- This command would lock guild chat. This means that NO ONE except for chiefs and leaders can talk in guild chat. It would be a toggle command, and doing /guild lock again would undo it.

These are both simple commands, I feel but they have their uses. Guild mute allows you to, well, mute players. Guild lock allows for executives' words to be seen if there are lots of players online, and events and such must be organized. Even if all of the guild bugs and glitches are fixed I still feel these commands should be added as to add to the efficiency and general enjoyment of guilds. Thanks for reading.

 

There is no point of guild chat if chiefs and leaders are the only one that can talk at times, and muting a player is just rude.

 

I like it, makes sense. +1
*COUGHCOUGH*ADDPOLL*COUGH*

 

how? .-.

 

then /guild leave if you don't like the owner lmao

 

then still, my argument still remains valid

/guild leave

 

the world is in guild chaos, the territories are split between Lir hax and BlA

 

There should be a territory limit so that starting guilds have a chance and so that the other guilds who don't have people in all timezones can have some territories.

 

If there was a territory limit, then competition over high level territories would increase exponentially as higher level guilds try to maximize their territory value.
The increased competition over high level territories would then, in turn, cause high level guilds to lose interest in low level territories.
From there, low level territories would constantly be under attack and would change hands far too often for any guild to get any use out of them.

The system we have right now where the top guilds control everything might be unfair, but it brings order.

 

That may be true but the low level places are probably the most popular as more people are there than anywhere else in the game. People will ALWAYS start new classes and they will always get good exp. the system now is unfair and not fun for any other guild. Territory limits would make it so that other guilds that aren't like hax and lir have a chance at the leaderboards (which should be based on lvl of the guild not the territory amount) without being destroyed by the huge guilds. The system now is anything but balanced.

 

I only mentioned those two because the UXs name slipped my mind for a second...

 

I see your point. I want lower level guilds to have the ability to rise up against the top level guilds too.
But, since low level guilds are the most popular, the amount of competition would be insane. The way the guild system is right now, where people can glitch capture territories, would cause utter mayhem as the territory could change hands several dozen times in just a few seconds if enough guilds were contesting for that land. Given the sheer amount of guilds, early level guilds would have a ton of problems and suffer a lot of difficulties.

Spoiler: What Glitch Capturing is

Glitch capturing is typing /guild attack on a territory that was captured by an enemy guild 2-3 minutes ago. By doing this, the server doesn't get the chance to recognize that the enemy guild has defended the territory so your guild gets to just capture it instantly without fighting. This behaviour can be reported and could result in guild deletion as this is abusing a glitch.

Although glitch capturing can result in guilds being deleted, new guilds can easily be created by new players who don't know about this glitch and will unknowingly abuse it.
Even if the glitch capturing bug was fixed, the territory would still change hands stupidly often due to the huge amount of lower level guilds. Having just 2 guilds contesting over a territory is mayhem enough, imagine having 200.

Right now, having the high level guilds control everything stops all of this mayhem from occurring because most high level guilds take the threat of getting deleted seriously and the high level mobs in the territory prevents low level guilds containing low level players from capturing the territory.
Low level guilds can still level up and capture territories however. The problem is that they require exceptionally good players to do this; high level players who are able to kill 1000 high level mobs.

I created my guild two months ago, and I've been soloing almost every guild war (#HumbleBrag) because my guildmates don't do shit *cough @MajesticMaj cough* My guild hit lvl 41 this past weekend and it's been one hell of a challenge for me. Becoming a high level guild is possible, it just takes a lot of work.

tl:dr: Capping the number of territories a guild can take would bring hell. Current guild system is shitty but works. Low level guild can still reach a high level but it takes high level players.

 

My point is that guilds should have a limit of territories but quite a bit still. 3 guilds should be aloud to control everything. I like guilds and guild wars but I don't like that I see 3 names flashing on and off every time I enter a territory... I DINT WANT TO SEE THISE 3 EVERY TIME...

 

#1 guild on leaderboards Hackforums #1 guild in my opinion UltimateXeons
#2 guild on leaderboards Libertas
#3 guild on leaderboards UltimateXeons aka UXs

 

I know. I just forgot the name do I didn't put it on

 

So I get to be Hitler :D

 

Lot, the lock command would be useful in times when the leaders need to say something important and have it seen. As for the mute part, I disagree. If someone joined your guild, glitched it out then spammed "LotusTea is stupid" over and over in guild chat, wouldn't you want to mute then? I would.

If that happened people could just leave. Them there would be no guild.

YES I AGREE. Then there would be more competition for the better territories, which creates more defending and attacking which means fun!

Okay enough make a new thread to discuss this please. This is a suggestion, not a debate. Also stop trying to promote your guild of just makes you seem desperate and annoying.

________________________________

Added a poll! I was rushed when I made this haha

 

@Eldrex I'd just kick them.

 

That's the whole point of this. If someone is in your guild and they change their name, the commands guild leave and guild kick do not work on them.

 

This idea is not going well.