Enchanting

I have noticed that you can get armor but it is always set positive effects or negatives. sure the the amount changes but i think enchanting your armor and weapons would be able to give a little more freedom in armor and weapon effects. also sometimes i like to play a game called fate and it has an enchanting system in which you could good effects or bad so there would be a sense of risk if you wanted to enchant something and the higher level you are the better the good effects and the bad effects worse.

 

Wtf is this even?

 

so, identifications but it's called enchanting?
okay

 

Nonsensical? Unthoughtful? Poorly detailed? Wacky? Wat? Stupid?

Take your pick

 

Fixed it

 

Although I have to agree the suggestion is not very detailed or thoughtful, such a reply certainly won't encourage a better one.

 

When you are identifying there's a risk, both in positive and negative stats. The higher the average stat is, the more variety there is that it can be.
Basicly it's what i just read, or if you mean you could get identifications that you normally can't get then that would break the game completly.

 

enchanting would also have a cost and that cost is emeralds. also the more effects on the armor the more emeralds it would cost. or how about this the more you enchant the higher risk there is
getting something bad plus the enchants would be level based. also the items that are legendary status wont be able to be enchanted.

 

I'm not entirely sure a positive comment would've either. If we said it was good, would he/she not have simply tried to make another?

The real problem here is that all he seems to be suggesting is renaming Identifying to Enchanting, which is an originality downgrade.

 

identifications would still exist its just depending on what that item has the enchanting cost would vary.

 

He does not want to remove idenficiations.
Just add "enchantments", which can be applied to a identified item, to modify(?) its stats I think

 

From re-reading his original posts several times, all I can understand is that he seems to believe that IDs are set changes and they shouldn't be as such. Maybe I'm mis-reading it, but it's incredibly hard to tell with the extreme lack of detail.

If enchantments are just "re-rolls" of IDs, then there's already a suggestion like this that's far more detailed, which he can go and give his support to.

 

Alright, a modification to the ID, at an emerald cost, would be interesting, but easily abused. Also, please, for the love of Salted, fix your post. You made a bunch of run-on sentences that lack capitalization at the beginning of them, you've essentially made an eye-burning wall of text, and you seem to be proposing something that already exists, in part, in the system, albeit done for you.

As a general rule, if you want your idea to be listened to, please use spellcheck, and ensure that it's readable. Nobody likes trying to read through a paragraph that has next to no periods or commas because the writer decided that they really wanted to make a tonne of run on sentences you know what I mean?

 

Yeah i know spellcheck but not everything has to be spellchecked for punctuation. Also for enchanting it could have a limited number of times you can enchant.

 

So, like how identifying was before Gavel?

 

#PrayForTheNewbieAdventurer

for real tho this kid looks like he got his account yesterday

 

I have played Wynncraft for a little while i just haven't made forum account until recently.

 

but that isn't true







he got it today
(sry I just had to)

 

So, Pre-Gavel Powders?