The semi-lack of Fallen-specific aspects

I realize that this thread is really stupid and not very valid in hindsight but I am just going to rip the bandaid off and post it, haha. I stopped writing despite having more thoughts to put out that would validate my text more, so in summary I just feel that the Fallen aspects feel somewhat lacking. This hurts my want for accurate information, haha. You can read it if you want to. Okay. Bye.
I am not sure if I'm seeing something that is simply not, because I was looking at the general ratios and they seemed pretty okay, but comparing to other classes I don't know. Anyways, I was looking through the Warrior aspect list, and it struck me just how few Fallen-specific aspects there are compared to Paladin or Battle Monk.
Excluding the aspects that are not archetype-specific, like increasing main attack range or aspects that affect multiple different abilities from differing archetypes, I counted seven Paladin aspects, six Battle Monk aspects, and five Fallen aspects. (What I am counting as an archetype-specific aspect is one that only affects abilities that are in that archetype's column. For example, Brink of Madness, technically not a Fallen ability, but I counted it for the aspect count because it is in that column and is generally useful in order to not die whilst corrupted, and is pretty clearly intended to be used that way. I also counted the mythic aspects so each archetype gets one automatically.)

 

yeah fallen and some other archetypes(i think rift too??) dont have many actual fallen aspects surely they get some more added before fruma alongisde aspect scrapping or smth