Any Class Help Stardew Solo Li

This is my current mage build, and this is my current shaman build
(I know stardew wont work with them, just giving them for reference)

I Recently got a stardew (almost max damage, but with -4/4mr) and I was hoping to get a good build for it to solo LI. I don’t have any other mythics.

preferences: I like to have around 8 or more mr (so keep in mind my mythics sucky mr) and decently high heals. I also like to be fairly tanky.
I’ll prolly be using it for soloing LI and for silent expanse stuff.

(I also have a max level warrior, I heard spell spam wasn’t good with warrior, but if you have a good build, share it)

 

Also, cursed fatal stardew build

 

stardew needs 75 dex and 75 int so you have to keep that in mind.
75 dex is quite costly if you're going for water build.

also since it has alot of raw spell damage and no %spell damage, use it on a spell that benefits from that specifically

 

I don’t understand what this means. What classes would be better benefitted by either?

Are you saying neutral spell damage would be superior (for example) to spell % for meteor (which has a 500% spell modifier) vs uppercut (which has a 300% spell modifier)? I don’t understand in what circumstance one would be superior to the other.

 

A very quickly made mage build, pls improve
TWF 7mr, using bonder, decent regen and health. Only 11k meteors though -_-

gonna try a TWA build tomorrow and see how it works.

 

for example meteor, arrowstorm and multihit benefit alot more from raw spell damage than %spell damage.
also for something like super fast attack speed weapon it's better to use raw spell, for slower weapons with more base damage go with %spell damage.

the nothing
https://wynndata.tk/s/k10mdv

nepta floodbringer
https://wynndata.tk/s/2e3byj

 

It’s not exactly about the multiplier. Mage benefits from raw because it has a low base weapon damage, so it doesn’t get boosted as much from %. In order to see the effects of % vs raw, you should do a weapon comparison, for example, pure benefits from raw spell more than % because 1% spell is only equal to 2 raw spell. Whereas in cataclysm, % is still better than raw spell when multihitting and in spin attacks because the ratio is the same, 1% equates to around 20 raw spell

 

That only applies to melee% and raw melee
The spell base damages will get multiplied by the attack speeds and the spell damage modifiers are added after

 

If you're using stardew, using a Mana regen build will probably cost you lots of damage and tankiness just from the sheer amount of dedication you'd have to put into sustain. Stardew is much better in spellsteal such as this https://wynndata.tk/s/hdk2ox (although your stardew has -4mr which is quite annoying).
With your req this is what I've got https://wynndata.tk/s/r52vgo but I really suggest you don't use that and instead use a spellsteal build.

 

Thank you to everyone explaining spell % vs raw spell, I think I understand now

And thank you for this build (and the nepta build), but I’m pretty sure it won’t work in game due to only having 70 int and stardew requiring 75 int, unless I’m mistaken.
But thank you very much for the suggestion! I’ll do some tinkering with it and hopefully make it how I like it.

here’s a version that works, but it raises man costs.

 

No it does work in game, because wynndata calculates Intel including the weapon. It essentially has 95 Intel and The Nothing has -25, so it looks like the build has 70, when it actually has 95 or something like that, I'm not sure about the numbers exactly but you get the idea.