Dismiss Notice
Wynncraft, the Minecraft MMORPG. Play it now on your Minecraft client at (IP): play.wynncraft.com. No mods required! Click here for more info...

Warrior/Knight Help Ewf/twf Build Experimentation (critique My Builds)

Discussion in 'Class Builds' started by RenZenthio, Sep 27, 2020.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. RenZenthio

    RenZenthio Murder the gods and topple their thrones! HERO

    Messages:
    1,886
    Likes Received:
    3,129
    Trophy Points:
    162
    Guild:
    Minecraft:
    TWF Ignition:
    https://wynndata.tk/s/oc05wh
    (I dont know if this has enough sustain (health or mana) but idk)

    EWF Braker:
    https://wynndata.tk/s/mfe8zy
    EW(F) Braker:
    https://wynndata.tk/s/iruqtk
    (I don’t like this second build just thought I’d include it since it actually does good damage)

    In an attempt to learn how to build EWF and TWF I made these builds, feel free to critique them/suggest different builds. (I’ve pretty much built exclusively WFA and WF so far)
     
  2. RenZenthio

    RenZenthio Murder the gods and topple their thrones! HERO

    Messages:
    1,886
    Likes Received:
    3,129
    Trophy Points:
    162
    Guild:
    Minecraft:
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2020
  3. Justice

    Justice Obliterator of Grooks VIP+

    Messages:
    1,071
    Likes Received:
    2,758
    Trophy Points:
    162
    Guild:
    Minecraft:
    The TWF Ignition-Quinque isn't bad but I'd either include some more raw spell damage as there is a lot of spell damage% but little raw spell damage, only coming from Quinque. It could also use the Anima Infused Cuirass to reduce spell costs further. Also lacks in the life steal department a bit.
    The Shaggy Boots version I think is slightly better with the fact that it has more life steal but it suffers with damage like the EWF Breaker build as well. If it were possible to introduce as well, the Anima Infused Cuirass might help reduce spell costs further.
    The EWF Breaker is good, nice health and spell sustainability but it lacks in damage a little.
    The EW(F) Breaker build I think is fine as is, has a nice amount of raw spell damage and spell damage percent. It does have a lower health regen than the other Breaker build but it's better than nothing.
    Edit: Just noticed that you would have to get rid of Intensity if you were to incorperate in Anima Infuse Cuirass. a replacement could either be Yang or most likely Olive.
    Another Edit: Olive requires strenth so there goes that, Yang might work.
    Damage tanks by a couple thousand to uppercut but you have like 1 spell cost spells for everything I guess.
    https://wynndata.tk/s/04wsc6
    https://wynndata.tk/s/6v4390
     
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2020
    RenZenthio likes this.
  4. iTechnically

    iTechnically don't ask me for warrior builds CHAMPION

    Messages:
    305
    Likes Received:
    395
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Minecraft:
    Well time to critique the critique, since there are some interesting things that have been said which are not entirely correct:
    • Having Raw Spell is not a necessity - for classes with higher base damage, % tends to be more effective than raw in most cases, and the damage that raw will add is minimal compared to %, so unless the build doesn't so enough damage so that it pierces through elemental defences, raw is not a factor in really judging a build.
    • Anima is cool and all, the problem is Medeis + intensity gets both higher defensive sp (as it is a free 30 skill point bonus) and higher damage, since intensity is such a ridiculous damage boost. So, in this case, it is a matter of compromising EHP and damage for Mana sustain. Warrior's spell costs are quite high, and so in this case this might just be the move to make, but usually it's really not.
    • EWF generally speaking has less damage than TWF spell-wise (probably not always the case, but usually you would expect a damage fall if you're looking at a TWF build VS. an EWF build).
     
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2020
    RenZenthio likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.