What Class Is The Best? (i Need Help)

I was talking to a "friend" about warriors archers mages and assassins...

We were talking that he said warriors suck and mages are better while I'm saying that mages suck and warriors are good so I'm super confused what class is better
(His POV) Mages > Archer > assassins > warrior
(My POV) Warrior > Archer > Mages > Assassins

P.S what class is best for ToA?

 

Archer

PS: for ToA - mage probs

 

I play a archer so of course I think its the best but all the classes are the same and not one of them is the best.

 

well u guys have a point
buttttttttt

 

On paper and in fighting, everything is balanced.
But some classes fits a playstyle better than others.


Mages in practice is very good becuase it is one of the most well rounded classes in the game for people who are not that rich.
It gets the only healing ability in the game, saves you a couple of emeralds here and there.
Equipment on the other hand is a different story.
Also last I used teleport, I got to unwanted places

Warrior is pretty tanky, but close combat. Pretty good crowd control as well. Suffers against anything ranged though, put pairs pretty well with mages and archers

Archer gets really good range and can damage enemies without agroing them, plus escape is a vertical and horizontal jump, which is pretty good.
Really low defense though, helpful to bring potions late game, if you don't go for health regen/life steal builds

Assassin is probably one of the most fun to play, but most difficult to master the late game.
Relies heavily on disabling the enemy and dealing DoT

Thats just my perspectives.
But they are all the same
There is no "best class"

 

If u think about this
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Warrior have the highest defense in game and highest neutral damage
Mages have the highest elemental damage
Archers have the highest DPS in general but super squishy
Assassin have the element of surprise annoying af

________________________________

but then this
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Warriors have the worst skills ever
Mages suck with people with elemental defense
Archer suck with defense
Assassin super hard to understand and hard in late game like Ethan_washington ._.

 

That is the core design.
You are neglecting the details and live testing.

As they say the devil is in the details.

I think I used that wrong whatever
:/

 

so far all I see is one person arguing a terrible point... and two people supporting me.... you're pathetic just be quiet already deathly

 

My "Friend" is getting mad
He is still thinking that mages are the best and warriors suck d**** and I have been trying to say that he is wrong but he is being ill-mannered about what he is saying ._. plz help

 

Don't put down another person because he has a different opinion. If a class doesn't fit his playstyle he probably won't think it's as good as someone who's playstyle fits the class does.

 

Basically
Archer:Ranged Assassin (not the wynncraft kind, I mean in general. The archer can do extremely high burst damage in a decent area, but isn't good at long, sustained fighting)
Mage: anti-sustain (heal keeps it from dying to sustained damage, ice snake and teleport can cut off damage, and meteor is a nuke that prevents people from wanting to stay around and fight.)
Warrior: Close ranged Crowd Control (high defense, decent damage, shit range)
Assassin, Sustained DPS (the assassin is able to out-damage every other class, but is not good as a source of burst damage, and is tough af to use)

 

1v1 my thrunda knight in nether cutie ill change your point of view

 

I would like to debate with your friend about how warrior is "bad"

Warrior isn't bad
All classes (on paper) are balanced.
If you have too many mages, it is very easy to counter if the boss deals large amounts of damage.
Warriors can very very very easily soak up damage, with a base armor rating of 120% and the warscream spell which increases the damage reduction of your character by 20%? (might be both elemental and neutral, I have no idea since the wiki does not clarify)
Along with a high defense stat of fire and elemental defense, when a mage is paired with a warrior, the combo can be extremely strong.
Warriors can also be equiped and moddified for high mana reduction in order to have a larger access to crowd control.

Perhaps you are arguing which class is better SOLO.
Mages are (usually) better solo than warriors since pots take up a lot of space, while most mage builds revolve around having at least the base amount of mana regen, so an endless supply of healing based on current health.
The only problem with that is the rate of which you can spam heal, which is a different disscussion altogether.

So I agree with you.
To an extent.
If you guys plan to play duo and stuff, doubling up on classes in general should be a bad idea.
But two mages might work, except against bosses, where you might have slightly more diffculty than let say, a warrior and mage

________________________________

BTW people like Selvut (one of GMs that makes a lot of stuff that has to do with PvE balancing) or any other staff should be able to explain better than me.
I don't know every aspect of the classes and the potential

 

icyedge is so mad at me lmfao

 

IDK choose whatever class you want to play (maybe not assassin if it's your first class)
It's your choice.
Your friend shouldn't always make the decision for you.

Most of the community is pretty helpful and stuff.
Good luck with whatever though

 

tbh I would say that both of you are wrong and that every class can counter the other it just depends. To add some insight assassins might have a hard time with mage, mages can stun them with a ranged spell that covers a lot of ground as well when an assassin resets (goes into hiding) a mage can heal and the assassin ends up taking more than he deals. But if a mage isn't careful an assassin can sneak up on it. Archers can counter everything if it has distance. Warrior can counter everything if it can survive. Assassin can counter everything if it can kill. Mage can counter everything if it does everything. For some PvE stuff Archer does good ranged CC and bossing. Assassins do excellent in bossing and do good melee CC. Warriors tend to tank a lot or focus on damage with the base 120% defense, they are able to knock mobs back or keep them in the air for a bit possibly allowing them to take less hits ir make some breathing room. Mages have an excellent stun spell and can heal without potions with an ok damage spell and a movment spell great for escaping tight situations they again would be considered more of an all round class.

 

You would literally kill yourself before killing me in a duel if I just sat there and did nothing

 

get better friends
honestly how dense do you have to be to be mad at a friend for his fucking opinions

 

Let him be mad
He stole my fuckin bandana

 

not friends first off... And we weren't talking about which was better in countering each others class we were talking about most useful and best f or soloing/questing in general every response was based off something you guys didn't know... Also I'm not mad once again you are taking one story, he wouldn't stop spamming me with his point so I called him obnoxious and now he thinks I'm mad...

________________________________

Would not stop talking about pointless stuff