Dismiss Notice
Wynncraft, the Minecraft MMORPG. Play it now on your Minecraft client at (IP): play.wynncraft.com. No mods required! Click here for more info...

Selling Circles Are Added To Wynncraft!

Discussion in 'Trade Market' started by Chickenometry, Apr 16, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Arkade

    Arkade Who am I? CHAMPION

    Messages:
    940
    Likes Received:
    1,072
    Trophy Points:
    123
    Minecraft:
    2 le and 32 eb :3
     
  2. Chickenometry

    Chickenometry A chicken that does trigonometry

    Messages:
    243
    Likes Received:
    101
    Trophy Points:
    70
    someone bidded 3LE if you are not aware :3
    ________________________________
    If the colliding objects are in the air, even if their initial motion is perpendicular to gravity, we cannot just take the final collision velocity as the one I calculated because the objects will still accelerate by g ''downward''. Of course, the horizontal component is unaffected.

    However, if your reference frame is accelerating by g to where gravity points at, then even with gravity pointing at any direction, the V I calculated still works but it will be the V viewed from this accelerating reference frame. (Correct me if I am wrong)

    EDIT: this reference frame thing only works if the objects are not placed on a table where no vertical net force acts on both of them

    EDIT v2: Ding, just pretend there is no gravity la, if there is, then the whole process of bumping will be pulling the thread out from the pile of threads above and below it. That is applying a force larger than or equal to u times the total weight of all the threads including this thread horizontally. Then do work on the thread and increase its PE and then lift the Section Info thread and the thread above it and place this thread on top of all other threads. Lastly, Put back the Section Info thread and whatever the other one is called.

    EDIT v3: Just go and revise for your DSE lol, I am here because I have free time (DSE next year)
     
    Last edited: Apr 17, 2016
  3. SilverMirror

    SilverMirror Retired IM HERO

    Messages:
    1,771
    Likes Received:
    6,476
    Trophy Points:
    162
    Minecraft:
    ks F=(mv-mu)/t gravity doesn't matter in momentum change anyways but nvm you're just bumping the thread even if you're wrong it won't matter anyways coz u hv DSE next year but if you're wrong and I can't see it then I'm screwed tmr lol
     
  4. Arkade

    Arkade Who am I? CHAMPION

    Messages:
    940
    Likes Received:
    1,072
    Trophy Points:
    123
    Minecraft:
    4 le BADUM
     
  5. Chickenometry

    Chickenometry A chicken that does trigonometry

    Messages:
    243
    Likes Received:
    101
    Trophy Points:
    70
    I guess you won~
     
  6. Chickenometry

    Chickenometry A chicken that does trigonometry

    Messages:
    243
    Likes Received:
    101
    Trophy Points:
    70
    Im just bumping the thread, if you really have to put gravity into calculation, I guess you will have a very hard time if you do not consider an accelerating reference frame. You are not given the t (time of collision) , not given the average force acting on this thread by the metal ball (R), so how can you use the (Fnet)t=mv-mu equation to find V? In this case, this equation involves 5 variables, 1) u, 2) v, 3)m, 4)t and 5)R. Given only u and m, how can you find v without t and R?

    And if gravity plays such a great role, I can't really 'bump' this thread for a substantial amount of time unless the V is really large.

    Maybe when I first said 'I cant do momentum conservation when gravity is taken into account' , it made you think that I had a wrong concept. What I should have said was 'I cant do momentum conservation with the limited information given in a simple way when gravity is taken into account' because the collision happens in the mid-air, and t and R are not given.

    Even so, I think this question is solvable

    EDIT: Actually, let's just settle this question aside and leave it
     
    Last edited: Apr 17, 2016
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.