Dismiss Notice
Wynncraft, the Minecraft MMORPG. Play it now on your Minecraft client at (IP): play.wynncraft.com. No mods required! Click here for more info...

Which Antipode Is Better?

Discussion in 'Trade Market' started by TheCleanser, Jan 17, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. TheCleanser

    TheCleanser Well-Known Adventurer

    Messages:
    147
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Antipode #1
    +9 Defense
    +7% Explosion
    -4% Fire defense
    +4% Water defense
    +1/2s Mana steal
    +2% Fire Dmg
    -4% Water Dmg
    +7 Intelligence
    +15% Spell Dmg


    Antipode #2
    +7 Defense
    +11% Explosion
    -5% Fire Defense
    +5% Water Defense
    +2/2s Mana steal
    +7 Fire dmg
    -6 Water dmg
    +5 Intelligence
    +8% Spell dmg

    If you have a better one, offer and I might buy that too.
     
  2. Seberichsen

    Seberichsen That one Phoenix that isn't like the others VIP+

    Messages:
    387
    Likes Received:
    77
    Trophy Points:
    60
    Guild:
    Minecraft:
    Number 2 I would say
     
  3. Mighty Burger

    Mighty Burger voids warranties

    Messages:
    514
    Likes Received:
    436
    Trophy Points:
    67
    I'd go with the antipode #2 because of it's higher mana steal.

    On a side note, their system for "steal" is confusing. By 2/2s do they mean 0.5 per second? Or 2 mana every 2 seconds, which is twice as much? And how does the "seconds" timer start? When they attack? Can someone have mutiple "seconds" timers at once?
     
  4. TheCleanser

    TheCleanser Well-Known Adventurer

    Messages:
    147
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Thanks for your help.
    ________________________________
    Also, is explosion good?
     
  5. and 17 others

    and 17 others Famous Adventurer VIP+

    Messages:
    1,202
    Likes Received:
    560
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Guild:
    Minecraft:
    I'll go with the first one bc of the +9 defense and +7 intelligence
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.