Im Looking Forward To 1.9

Jeg har sett noen videoer om lag 1,9 Og jeg tror det skal være AZUM. Maybe wynncraft can use the New arrows in 1.9 to some powerups for Archer. And the other classes can get powerups too. Like an iron shield for the Warrior. And something like that.

 

Sadly, Wynn may have to stay 1.8, dual wielding would really screw with spells.

 

Duhhw... Did you switch language while writing?

 

I'm sorry, WHAT?

 

Oopsey hihu

 

Today, shall be remembered. Because, today is the day the english language died.

 

I don't care about 1.9 >:3
I am more excited to see what they do for 2.0

 

why does everyone think there will be. 2.0 they said 1.10 will be next

 

yeah i like the idea of it

 

i like the idea, too^^

 

nice ideai got no alerts today #howisthispossible

 

With some serious plugin overhauls, this might be a thing 2 or 3 years from now. I doubt it'll be added soon, but instead "soon".

Dear God no. Someone teach the people at Mojang some elementary math.

 

2.0 means sequel
you want minecraft to have a sequel, totally unrelated to the 1.X version we are in?

 

What you are missing from the whole equation is that it couldn't be 1.10 because 1.9 = 1.90 just as 1.8 = 1.80 and etc. Hereby meaning that the next possible update after all of 1.9 updates would, by logic, be 2.0

 

mathematicly, yes. functionally(or whatever), no.

2.0, like i said before, means sequel. so if it's not 1.10, it's not gonna be 2.0 either.

 

Well this is the combad update right? Where are the noew wepons? We just get new arrow tipes and shields... im rly mising new wepons in this update ;-;

 

And i'm missing your proper grammar, but I agree, it is quite disappointing that there are no new weapons.

I would have loved to see knives, katana's, spears and crossbows.

 

Ok, so to explain a thing. So far they have used both 1.10 and 2.o as April Fools jokes, but if I had to guess, after 1.9 would be 2.0

Here is why:


So logistically, 1.10 would really just be 1.1...

But 2.0 does not mean squeal.

When you are dealing with versions of something, number.number version and subversion...

So 1.9 would be the last subversion of 1, and 2.0 would be the first subversion of 2, but 1 and 2 are still versions of the same thing, 2 is not necessarily the squeal.

So yeah, I hope that clears things up!

________________________________

Also, after 1.9, I would not expect 2.0 for a WHILE

 

if you want another 1.1 you would need to say it like "1.01"

...if you put a 0 after a number it increases it, ten, hundred, thousand, etc


EDIT: also, we have a 1.7.10 skrubss

 

Oh I see what your saying. ok hmm. I still think ill go to 2.0 tho

instead of sub-sub versions like 1.6.4

ok i see what u mean...