The Game of Mao

There are no walls inside the Fruman wars. [breaks rule 4]

 

This post breaks rule 4, but you’re fine.

 

Mao Zedong is the best chairman ever and nothing happened in tianenmen square 1989

 

why isn't there a dislike button

Mac N Cheese Man, your next line is "This post breaks rule 4, but you're fine." And you ignored my post above so I am EXTREMELY sad now :(

 

This post breaks rule 4, but you’re fine.

________________________________

This post breaks rule 4, you know the drill.

________________________________

This post breaks rule 4, but you’re fine.

________________________________

Now I will give you another hint. The notion that the rule is post-to-post based is, indeed, correct.

 

So that means you have to quote some specific post in order to not break the rule?

this breaks rule 4.

 

This post breaks rule 4, but you’re fine.

I don’t know, does it?

 

Well, I don’t really have much to say for this rule other than it’s “interesting.” Have fun, guys.

[breaks rule 4]

________________________________

Guys, I will say that I’ve just changed the rule a slight amount, but it still retains the same concept. And all of the previous posts are fine.

 

This post breaks rule 4, but you’re fine. (I am counting the “[breaks rule 4]” as part of the post.)

 

Does the [breaks rule 4] always count as part of the post, or is it just because it’s in the middle of the post?

this post breaks the rule

 

List of non content post info:
Post time
Last edit time
Post user (and user info)
Post index in thread (251)
Post id (3512755)

And this post breaks rule 4

 

This rule breaks rule 4.

Actual question, can rules repeat / stack? I don't know if that would be valid or not

 

This post breaks rule 4, but you’re fine.
Also, the thing was at the end of the first post.

________________________________

This post breaks rule 4, but you’re fine.

________________________________

This post breaks rule 4, but you’re fine.
Also, they might be able to. You don’t know.

 

Well, I don’t really have much to say for this rule other than it’s “interesting.” Have fun, guys.

________________________________

Guys, I will say that I’ve just changed the rule a slight amount, but it still retains the same concept. And all of the previous posts are fine.

 

This post does not break rule 4.

 

rule guess
it has to be a double post and cant have “this post breaks rule 4” in it

 

This rule guess is incorrect, and breaks rule 4. You know the drill.

 

Well, I don’t really have much to say for this rule other than it’s “interesting.” Have fun, guys.

Guys, I will say that I’ve just changed the rule a slight amount, but it still retains the same concept. And all of the previous posts are fine.

 

This post breaks rule 4, you know the drill.

 

At this point I may just try out random things. Like seriously, no one else is commenting, and I am not always online anyway.

________________________________

There are several patterns from the previous post, which I am trying this out. Well, just write one more sentence just to make sure.