In the News Trump Or Clinton

Because we should believe "victims" 100% of the time even if they have the potential to be liars. (Sarcasm)

 

Even when confronted with what may or may not be true, he just insults them further!

 

[HATE SHIELD INITIATED]

I don't really see why there is so much hate towards Hillary. She was attorney, senator, First Lady, and Secretary of State, with other qualifications under her belt. She may have made mistakes, but she has also done good. And she's definitelY better than a certain wall-building, hate-screaming, 'murica-loving, psychopath.

 

Cross off "murica-loving", we're not even certain that's true. Isn't it a little suspicious that he's saying literally everything many people WANT to hear (Protection from ISIS, solving Illegal Immigration, etc.)? That, paired with the fact that Trump is apparently giving his running mate foreign and domestic policies, which is practically everything except commander-in-cheif and the ability to veto bills, makes me wonder if Trump wants to be president just for luxury...

Also, I actually only say bad things about Hillary to avoid the hate. I will not deny that she has done some bad and stupid things in the past (But then again, haven't we all? I mean our screw-ups weren't as large, but whatever), but she has done quite a lot of good in her decades of experience with this kind of thing, whilst Trump has no experience and seemingly little knowledge of politics. Let's see some comparisons:

Percentage of how often the lie/make stuff up about factual things that can be checked:
Trump: 53.3% lies.
Hillary: Approx. 17%-19.9% (Can't remember exact percent, but I'm almost certain it's somewhere between those 2 numbers... Or was it 13? I'm not sure) lies.

Trump Supporters: Hillary 'liar' Clinton
Me: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Wait, that wasn't a joke?

Spoiler: Main Scandals

Hillary: Emails
Note: The FBI looked through approx. 2,000 of them and found 3 with a confidential tag, and none were where it was supposed to be. At that rate, 30,000 would be 45 emails that are officially confidential.
Clinton Foundation's Donors:
We all know of America's tensions with Russia, right? Naturally, them donating to the Clinton foundation would be skeptical. Guess what, Hillary wasn't actually involved in the transaction.

Trump: Trump University
Not only was it not legally an official university, but it was a complete scam (One of my irl friends make a joke: "One of the textbooks were probably "Winners Aren't Losers". Trump made a book. No joke.)
Trump Foundation:
I'm not sure if it's a charity, considering Trump used the funds from it to have a highly detailed portrait of himself painted. It now hangs on the wall of one of his restaurants. He'll probably move it if he builds the wall.

 

Lmao

 

I'm registering to become a citizen of Asgardia, no way am I staying here on earth with these two clowns

 

http://www.morningledger.com/world-...declares-war-if-hillary-clinton-wins/1381015/

 

I vote we all move to Canada bc it's not as fucked as America
btw my favorite joke about this election:
Britan and America are having a competition to see who can fuck themselves up the most
Britan is in the lead with Brexit but America has a Trump card

 

They are both terrible candidates, although Clinton is a little less terrible in my opinion. But whoever gets elected will be hated by probably the majority of the people since everyone just seems to vote for the lesser evil. These elections seem to me like the most controversial in history. Neither Trump nor Clinton will start a world war III though, and I don't think they could even if they wanted to.

 

Let me get this straight: You want a person who is either a psychopath or corrupted by fame and fortune to be president, namely Commander in Chief of the military? Also, I wouldn't be surprised if terrorist attacks from ISIS increased due to the inflammatory things Trump has said, and I think that's worse than war. That is, of course, if Syria still stands once Trump imminently gets his hands on the U.S. missile launch codes.

 

This is hardly a reply to what he posted.

 

In a nutshell: Constant Terrorist Attacks (Which Trump may cause) is worse than war (Which Hillary may cause). Also, Trump may end up starting wars himself, as he vouches for actions that would start a war.

 

A nuke exchange in a ww3 scenario would be over within an hour. Their would be no winners only the deaths of you, me, and families across America. Where do you think Hillary and the (((Elites))) will be when ww3 begins and we are all dying? Hiding underground in their nuclear bunkers. Terrorist attacks can be handled and dealt with, ww3 cannot.

 

And Trump will launch nukes (or at least try), causing more civilian casualties than WWIII or the resulting terrorist attacks as I'm not sure if he'll launch them with the intent of crippling nations (which will still wipe out thousands of people) or not.

 

Simple explanation is to call ted cruz to kill them both CCCCCCCCOOOOOUGHHHHHHHHHHHHH CCCCCCCCCOOOOOOOOOUGHHHHHHHH ZODAC KILLER CONFIRMED

 

What I'm getting here is a heavy mix between "OH NOES THE WORLDS GUNNA END" and hardcore memelords. Looks like we need a little education on global politics and why the world won't end. Now I'm no genius on the political affairs in the United States as I am from the UK so I never really cared that much but from my the research I have done and general common sense here are the reasons why you will not fall into a global nuclear war or whatever;

• First is the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. Or in simple terms no one make any more nukes. This means that the US (or any other country who signed it, which is pretty much everyone but North Korea, Israel and India.) Cannot make or send (apart from a few special cases which were agreed by the entire UN (United Nations)) nuclear weapons.
• Secondly the UN is entirely against the use of nuclear weapons, the UN consisting of pretty much everybody. So considering the entire might of every superpower (and more) in the world (minus the US cause we talking about them) is against the use of nuclear weapons, I'm pretty sure even a lunatic like Hillary or Trump wouldn't be stupid enough to use them. Even if nuclear missiles were fired by the United states we need to remember that missile defense systems do exist.
• Thirdly as I have mentioned before, if the need really arises the government agencies such as the FBI or CIA would surely take care of them. If that means faking things to get them impeached or other means, I'm sure the rest of the united states government won't just stand and watch their country burn.

Basically, the world won't end. We are all fine. Carry on with your pitiful lives.

On an unrelated topic, remind me to make a plan before writing out a response like this. It took far too long to make.

 

You speak like nukes are the only missiles or air-bombs that exist... I'm trying to have hope, but 'tis just not working.

 

Missile defense systems work for all missiles and long range surface to air missiles have existed for a long time, Long range radar would detect the incoming aircraft or missile and appropriate action would be taken.

 

trump also has numerous failed business ventures including Go Trump, Trump Steaks, and a Housing buisness right before the housing market crashed
you can find those and more at

 

Let's hope so, I guess... But who would you rather have in charge of this country? Though that did quell my worry of Trump becoming president a little...

You watch that as well?